SC orders action against Mau SPs over casual trial approach
Headline by Prism · from 1 report
The Supreme Court ordered the Uttar Pradesh government to initiate departmental proceedings against Mau district police superintendents for a slow criminal trial.
The brief
Written by software from the 1 report below.
- The Supreme Court directed the Uttar Pradesh government to discipline superintendents of police who served in Mau district since 2023.
- This action follows a 2017 kidnapping case where only two of 54 witnesses were examined in three years.
- Judges expressed shock at the lack of progress in the trial despite the charges being framed in 2023.
- The court required the Chief Secretary to provide a report on the disciplinary proceedings by the next hearing on November 16.
What to watch next
- The filing of the status report by the Chief Secretary by November 16
- Progress of the departmental proceedings against the Mau superintendents of police
The points restate the reports; where one says why it matters, that is Prism's reading, not a reported fact.
Who said what
2 quotes · 1 outlet
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
1 quote · 1 outlet
“This leaves us in no doubt that the prosecution, which is accountable for producing witnesses, has been absolutely slack in its duty towards the court in the conduct of criminal trial,”
In the article
…2017, despite charges being framed against six accused in March 2023. It noted that the 14-year-old son of the petitioner was kidnapped on September 27, 2017, and till date, neither he nor his remains had been found. " This leaves us in no doubt that the prosecution, which is accountable for producing witnesses, has been absolutely slack in its duty towards the court in the conduct of criminal trial, " the bench said in its September 21 order. The top court said it is basically the investigating agency which is under obligation to produce witnesses. "We are shocked at the conduct of the prosecution in not ensuring…
R Mahadevan
1 quote · 1 outlet
“We are shocked at the conduct of the prosecution in not ensuring that witnesses are produced before the court for more than three years and, as of today, only two witnesses stand examined,”
In the article
…in its duty towards the court in the conduct of criminal trial," the bench said in its September 21 order. The top court said it is basically the investigating agency which is under obligation to produce witnesses. " We are shocked at the conduct of the prosecution in not ensuring that witnesses are produced before the court for more than three years and, as of today, only two witnesses stand examined, " it said. The bench noted that pursuant to its August 10 order, the incumbent superintendent of police of Mau was present in the court and has filed an affidavit dated August 29. "On a query of the court as to how many…
Coverage
1 outlet
All filed from India
NamedIndia · Mau · Uttar Pradesh Police · Ahsanuddin Amanullah · Allahabad High Court · Central Bureau of Investigation · R Mahadevan · Supreme Court of India
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Corrections and versions
A correction says what was wrong and why. Every earlier headline and brief of this record is kept.
Something wrong?
Say what, and it arrives with this record's address filled in. A correction is welcome.
Ask this story
Answers cite the 1 report above, or say they can't.