The record
Written by software from the 1 report below. The points restate them; where one says why it matters, that is Prism's reading, not a reported fact.
- The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation challenging the 2018 amendment to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
- The bench maintained that the amendment, which prohibits anticipatory bail and removes requirements for preliminary investigations before FIRs, was already upheld in a 2020 ruling.
- The petitioner argued that these provisions facilitate reverse discrimination and potential misuse of the law.
- The 2018 amendment was originally passed by Parliament to nullify previous court conditions that required prior authorization for arrests and mandatory preliminary inquiries.
- This decision reaffirms the legal protections and enforcement procedures currently in place for the SC/ST Act.
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Brij Bhushan Saini · Joymalya Bagchi · Parliament · Supreme Court · Surya Kant · Vishnu Shankar Jain · V Mohana
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Corrections and versions
A correction says what was wrong and why. Every earlier headline and brief of this record is kept.
Something wrong?
Say what, and it arrives with this record's address filled in. A correction is welcome.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.
