The record
Written by software from the 1 report below. The points restate them; where one says why it matters, that is Prism's reading, not a reported fact.
- A Supreme Court advocate has filed a request for statutory consent to launch criminal contempt proceedings against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
- The request claims that decisions were issued in the name of the full commission while bypassing the other two Election Commissioners.
- These commissioners reportedly documented written objections regarding administrative decisions on electoral rolls.
- The legal action alleges wilful defiance of Supreme Court judgments governing the constitutional function of the Election Commission.
What to watch next
- Decision of the Attorney General on granting consent for contempt proceedings
- Developments regarding the Supreme Court referral of petitions on the 2023 Election Commissioner appointment law
- Official response from the Election Commission of India regarding the allegations
Related reporting
Grouped by subject or cast while the story boundary is under human review. No chronology is implied.
Loading the story…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Gyanesh Kumar · Brajesh Singh · Dipankar Datta · Election Commission of India · R Venkataramani · Sukhbir Singh Sandhu · Supreme Court of India · Vivek Joshi
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Something wrong?
Say what, and it arrives with this record's address filled in. A correction is welcome.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.
