The record
Written from the 1 report below. Nothing here is unsourced.
- A new public interest litigation challenges the failure to enforce noise pollution standards and control DJ systems in Pune during festivals.
- The petition requests the appointment of a third-party agency to monitor violations and enforce legal actions against offenders.
- An earlier court order from 2016 mandates state authorities to manage and control noise pollution.
- An incident involving an activist assault serves as a key reason for the requested urgent legal intervention.
What to watch next
- Court hearing scheduled for October 5
- Potential court directions on third-party noise monitoring
- State response to allegations of non-compliance with 2016 judgment
Who said what1
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Anil Sakhare
senior counsel
1 quote · 1 outlet
“effective, meaningful and time-bound implementation and enforcement of an earlier judgment”
In the article
…seasons. Mentioning the PIL for urgent hearing before a bench of Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna on Friday, senior counsel Anil Sakhare said it was filed in larger public interest for “ effective, meaningful and time-bound implementation and enforcement of an earlier judgment ”. The authorities fail to effectively monitor ambient noise levels or deploy calibrated sound-level meters, flouting past court judgments, Sakhare submitted. The HC said the PIL would be heard on October 5. The Ganpati…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Pune · Advait Sethna · Anil Sakhare · Bombay High Court · Mahesh Bedekar · Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.