The record
Written from the 1 report below. Nothing here is unsourced.
- The Bombay High Court granted bail to Rajendra N Lodha, a former director at Lodha Developers.
- The court found that the Enforcement Directorate did not meet legal requirements for arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
- Enforcement officials failed to record the accused person's statement or seize incriminating evidence despite having judicial permission to do so.
- This ruling highlights the power of courts to review the legality of arrests to prevent agency misuse.
Who said what3
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Milind Jadhav
Justice
1 quote · 1 outlet
“Courts can judicially review the legality of arrest”
In the article
…Mumbai: “ Courts can judicially review the legality of arrest ” to prevent its misuse, the Bombay High Court said on Monday, and granted bail to former director of Lodha Developers, Rajendra N Lodha, arrested in February by Enforcement Directorate (ED). The ED had stepped in after…
Aabad Ponda
senior counsel
1 quote · 1 outlet
“complete violation of the mandate of section 19 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)”
In the article
…exigency” that arose to warrant his arrest by ED by forgoing its own earlier stand of recording his statement and confronting him with material it had, observed Justice Milind Jadhav. The arrest by ED was in “ complete violation of the mandate of section 19 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) ” which requires the agency to justify its ‘reasons to believe’ that a person is guilty of the offences before arresting him, his senior counsel Aabad Ponda submitted before Justice Milind Jadhav as he sought quashing…
Anil Singh
ASG
1 quote · 1 outlet
“minor procedural lapses on the part of the Authorized Officers may not be seen with a magnifying glass by the Courts…”
In the article
…quashing of the remand order. The ED, through ASG Anil Singh, said Lodha’s plea was an abuse of process and filed essentially for bail without having to go through the rigorous test meant for bail orders. Singh said, “ minor procedural lapses on the part of the Authorized Officers may not be seen with a magnifying glass by the Courts… ” Justice Jadhav, however, analysed the law and facts of the case to hold that courts can judicially examine an arrest as it is “inherent in Section 19 in view of the safeguards to prevent its misuse.” The accused was…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Lodha Developers · Aabad Ponda · Anil Singh · Bombay High Court · Enforcement Directorate · Milind Jadhav · Mumbai Police · Rajendra N Lodha
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.