ECI officials reject BJP MLA’s request for scrutiny of 2,598 votes
Headline by Prism · from 1 report
Election officials in Belagavi rejected a BJP MLA's request to scrub over 2,000 alleged bogus voters from the constituency electoral rolls.
The brief
Written by software from the 1 report below.
- Election Commission of India officials denied a demand from MLA Abhay Patil to delete nearly 2,600 names from electoral rolls in the Belagavi North constituency.
- The Electoral Registration Officer stated that current regulations do not permit the bulk removal of voter entries during the Special Intensive Revision process.
- Booth Level Agents retain the authority to file individual objections for review by Booth Level Officers.
- The disagreement highlights ongoing tensions between political parties regarding voter verification procedures ahead of upcoming elections.
What to watch next
- Possible appeal to the Election Commission of India by the MLA.
- Actions taken by Booth Level Officers on individual Form 7 objections filed by Booth Level Agents.
The points restate the reports; where one says why it matters, that is Prism's reading, not a reported fact.
Who said what
2 quotes · 1 outlet
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Abhay Patil
MLA
1 quote · 1 outlet
“I have not asked for deletion of the names of any elector. I am only asking SIR officers to conduct an inquiry, look into allegations of inclusion of bogus voters, scrutinise Forms 6 and 7 submitted by suspect voters and delete their names if found false. I am not only an MLA, but also Booth Level Agent No. 1 for my constituency. I have a right to do so. I also have a responsibility towards ensuring clean elections and a duty to express solidarity with BLA 2 and my other associates who have gone door to door to trace bogus voters”
In the article
…the BJP MLA was targeting Muslim voters to further his prospects in the next election. ‘Not seeking bulk deletion’ Speaking to reporters in Belagavi on Friday, Mr. Patil said he had not sought bulk deletion of voters. “ I have not asked for deletion of the names of any elector. I am only asking SIR officers to conduct an inquiry, look into allegations of inclusion of bogus voters, scrutinise Forms 6 and 7 submitted by suspect voters and delete their names if found false. I am not only an MLA, but also Booth Level Agent No. 1 for my constituency. I have a right to do so. I also have a responsibility towards ensuring clean elections and a duty to express solidarity with BLA 2 and my other associates who have gone door to door to trace bogus voters ,” he said. Mr. Patil said that Deepak Patil, the BLA 2, and his team had identified some bogus voters and filed objections through Form 7 with the respective BLOs. “However, the BLOs had not acted on those objections.…
B.K. Hariprasad
MLC and KPCC chairman
1 quote · 1 outlet
“the MLA had no locus standi to write to SIR officials seeking bulk deletion of voters. He alleged that the BJP MLA was targeting Muslim voters to further his prospects in the next election.”
In the article
…submitted details of the suspected voters, along with their part numbers and booth numbers, and sought scrutiny of their entries. B.K. Hariprasad, MLC and KPCC chairman, had objected to Mr. Patil’s move, arguing that the MLA had no locus standi to write to SIR officials seeking bulk deletion of voters. He alleged that the BJP MLA was targeting Muslim voters to further his prospects in the next election. ‘Not seeking bulk deletion’ Speaking to reporters in Belagavi on Friday, Mr. Patil said he had not sought bulk deletion of voters. “I have not asked for deletion of the names of any elector. I am only asking SIR…
Coverage
1 outlet
All filed from India
NamedIndia · Belagavi · Abhay Patil · Bharatiya Janata Party · B.K. Hariprasad · Election Commission of India · Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee · M. Karthik
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Corrections and versions
A correction says what was wrong and why. Every earlier headline and brief of this record is kept.
Something wrong?
Say what, and it arrives with this record's address filled in. A correction is welcome.
Ask this story
Answers cite the 1 report above, or say they can't.