The record
Written from the 2 reports below. Nothing here is unsourced.
- The Election Commission of India has told the Supreme Court that over 37 lakh appeals from West Bengal's Special Intensive Revision remain pending before 19 tribunals.
- Only 1,02,231 appeals out of a total 38,20,683 filed have been disposed of so far.
- The pendency figures were disclosed in an Election Commission affidavit filed after petitioners complained the tribunal data was being kept from the public.
- A large share of the appeals, around 31 lakh, were filed by the Election Commission or other objectors seeking to exclude more voters from the electoral roll, while about seven lakh were filed by disenfranchised voters seeking re-inclusion.
- Municipal elections in West Bengal are approaching, so the slow disposal of appeals leaves many voters' eligibility unresolved.
What to watch next
- Whether the Supreme Court decides to constitute more tribunals after reviewing the pendency data.
- Whether the court directs priority for appeals filed by disenfranchised voters seeking re-inclusion.
- Whether appeal disposal speeds up before the upcoming West Bengal municipal elections.
What changed2
Every report on this story, newest first. Times are when each outlet published.
The Times of India2d ago[1]
Over 37 lakh appeals pending after Bengal SIR: EC tells Supreme CourtThe Hindu2d ago[2]
West Bengal SIR: Over 37 lakh appeals stuck in Tribunals as Municipal polls draw near
Who said what2
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Prasenjit Bose
1 quote · 1 outlet
“more than 58 lakh electors were excluded during the enumeration phase of the SIR exercise in West Bengal.”
In the article
…however, did not provide a break-up of the appeals filed by electors whose names were deleted and those filed against the inclusion of names in the electoral rolls.Prasenjit Bose, who filed the affidavit, claimed that more than 58 lakh electors were excluded during the enumeration phase of the SIR exercise in West Bengal. He added that while 9.64 lakh applications for inclusion (Forms 6 and 6A) and over 99,000 applications for deletion (Form 7) were received during the claims and objections phase, only around 1.82 lakh additions were…
Joymalya Bagchi
Justice of the Supreme Court of India
1 quote · 1 outlet
“Give us the data. Give us the breakup of the nature of appeals filed, whether inclusion or exclusion. Then, we will make a call as to whether appeals by disenfranchised voters seeking re-inclusion should be prioritised… Their exclusion from the electoral roll denudes them of their voting rights”
In the article
…on the need to constitute more tribunals after getting the statistics right. The Bench had also asked the EC to consider a mechanism for updating, streamlining the progress of pending appeals before the tribunals. “ Give us the data. Give us the breakup of the nature of appeals filed, whether inclusion or exclusion. Then, we will make a call as to whether appeals by disenfranchised voters seeking re-inclusion should be prioritised… Their exclusion from the electoral roll denudes them of their voting rights ,” Justice Joymalya Bagchi, part of a Bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, had observed. Keeping the Municipal polls in mind, Mr. Sankaranarayanan had argued in August that the court must direct the tribunals to…
Related reporting
Grouped by subject or cast while the story boundary is under human review. No chronology is implied.
Loading the story…
Why it matters4
Who is affected first and what likely follows, with a direction and a horizon. Extracted from the reports, never invented.
- West Bengal SIR appellants (over 37 lakh) appeal resolution delayed· weeks
- West Bengal election tribunals case backlog· longer
- West Bengal electoral roll finalisation roll status uncertainty· longer
- Election Commission of India / Supreme Court judicial scrutiny of sir· days
Coverage2
All filed from India
Named India · West Bengal · Calcutta High Court · Election Commission · Election Commission of India · Gopal Sankaranarayanan · Joymala Bagchi · Joymalya Bagchi · Neha Rathi · Prasenjit Bose · Supreme Court · Surya Kant · V Mohana
The 2 reports are listed beside the record.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.
