The record
Written from the 1 report below. Nothing here is unsourced.
- The Supreme Court asked the Tamil Nadu government to explore alternative land arrangements for its proposed open-air jail instead of evicting SASTRA University.
- The university offered to pay for alternative land, but the state government argued the currently disputed land remains superior in value and accessibility.
- Judges emphasized the institution serves a public educational purpose and contrasted it with commercial or illegal use.
- The court granted an adjournment for the state to seek further instructions on this potential resolution.
Who said what4
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Rakesh Dwivedi
Senior advocate
2 quotes · 1 outlet
“the alternate parcels were inferior to the disputed land in terms of value, accessibility, and contiguity.”
In the article
…He said the State government seemed to be in favour of a contiguous parcel of land spanning 86.8 acres, but later changed its position. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the State government, said the alternate parcels were inferior to the disputed land in terms of value, accessibility, and contiguity. He said that the State government’s proposed open-air jail could not be constructed because of the pending litigation while the university had continued construction on the encroached land. The CJI suggested that if…
“such an approach could amount to putting a premium on encroachment.”
In the article
…the university could pay its market value. “If the market price comes to you, you buy the land of your choice. Or you identify the land, we will tell them to buy the land for you,” the CJI said. Mr. Dwivedi said that such an approach could amount to putting a premium on encroachment. The Chief Justice said the dispute concerned an educational institution. “If someone was running a resort there or running a commercial complex or having a shopping mall there, or having immoral or illegal activity…
C.S. Vaidyanathan
Senior advocate
1 quote · 1 outlet
“the university had offered three parcels of land to the State government.”
In the article
…Court had upheld the State government’s rejection of its request for assignment or exchange of government land and directing its eviction. Senior advocate C.S. Vaidyanathan, appearing for SASTRA, told the court that the university had offered three parcels of land to the State government. He said the State government seemed to be in favour of a contiguous parcel of land spanning 86.8 acres, but later changed its position. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the State government, said the…
CJI
1 quote · 1 outlet
“If someone was running a resort there or running a commercial complex or having a shopping mall there, or having immoral or illegal activity there, we would have thrown them out”
In the article
…will tell them to buy the land for you,” the CJI said. Mr. Dwivedi said that such an approach could amount to putting a premium on encroachment. The Chief Justice said the dispute concerned an educational institution. “ If someone was running a resort there or running a commercial complex or having a shopping mall there, or having immoral or illegal activity there, we would have thrown them out ,” the CJI said. Mr. Dwivedi was granted an adjournment to seek instructions from the State government on the suggestions made by the court. Published - September 21, 2026 10:55 pm IST…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · SASTRA University · C.S. Vaidyanathan · Madras High Court · Rakesh Dwivedi · Supreme Court · Tamil Nadu Government
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.