The election umpire must play by its own rulebook

The record

Written by software from the 1 report below. The points restate them; where one says why it matters, that is Prism's reading, not a reported fact.

Reports indicate conflict within the Election Commission of India over whether the Chief Election Commissioner acted unilaterally against the consensus of fellow commissioners.
Allegations suggest that voter registration forms were modified without following established legal notification procedures.
Concerns have also been raised regarding software tools that may restrict the statutory authority of electoral registration officers.
The institution faces pressure to provide clear explanations to maintain public confidence in the electoral process.

Clarification from the Election Commission on the use and access of ECINet software
Further evidence regarding the alleged unilateral decision-making by the Chief Election Commissioner
Legal assessment of changes made to Form 6 voter registration processes

1 report

English national1

All filed from India

Named India · Election Commission of India · Gyanesh Kumar · Sukhbir Singh Sandhu · Supreme Court · Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy · Vivek Joshi

The 1 report is listed beside the record.

A correction says what was wrong and why. Every earlier headline and brief of this record is kept.

Say what, and it arrives with this record's address filled in. A correction is welcome.

Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.