The record
Written by software from the 1 report below. The points restate them; where one says why it matters, that is Prism's reading, not a reported fact.
- Two election commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, formally raised fourteen objections regarding decisions made during the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls between October 2025 and August 2026.
- The Election Commission dismissed reports of internal discord, stating that differing opinions are part of a normal deliberative process to ensure transparency.
- Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi alleged that the removal of over 13 crore names from voter lists constitutes vote theft and promised consequences.
- The Supreme Court has separately requested an explanation from the commission regarding voter notices issued in Delhi.
What to watch next
- Supreme Court response to the Election Commission regarding Delhi electoral notices
- Outcome of the third phase of the Special Intensive Revision covering 16 states
- Further political developments regarding the opposition's demand for investigation into electoral roll changes
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · C.P. Radhakrishnan · Election Commission · Gyanesh Kumar · Indian Express · Jairam Ramesh · KC Venugopal · Om Birla · Rahul Gandhi · Sukhbir Singh Sandhu · Supreme Court · Vivek Joshi
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Something wrong?
Say what, and it arrives with this record's address filled in. A correction is welcome.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.
