The record
Written from the 1 report below. Nothing here is unsourced.
- The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a plea by a 16-year-old girl and her adult partner seeking police protection for their live-in relationship, in an order dated August 3.
- The couple had said they feared threats and violence from the girl's family after she left her parental home to live with the man.
- The court held that granting protection would indirectly endorse a live-in arrangement involving a minor, which the law does not permit, and that a minor's welfare remains the primary legal concern.
- It nonetheless directed the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to take necessary steps in accordance with law.
What to watch next
- Steps taken by the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, following the court's direction
- Whether the couple's safety concerns are addressed despite the protection plea being dismissed
- Any further litigation on police protection for minors in such relationships in light of the court's reliance on the earlier division bench ruling
Who said what1
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Sumeet Goel
1 quote · 1 outlet
“To extend the mantle of protection in such circumstances would, in effect, constitute an implicit approbation of a live-in arrangement involving minors, a proposition repugnant to the established statutory framework designed to shield the young and impressionable from exploitation and moral peril”
In the article
…seek protection from courts. The court observed that the law places restrictions on minors because they are considered incapable of making such decisions independently and their welfare remains the primary concern. " To extend the mantle of protection in such circumstances would, in effect, constitute an implicit approbation of a live-in arrangement involving minors, a proposition repugnant to the established statutory framework designed to shield the young and impressionable from exploitation and moral peril ," the court observed. The court further observed that granting protection in such cases would go against the legal framework meant to safeguard minors. It said courts must ensure the welfare of children and should not…
Related reporting
Grouped by subject or cast while the story boundary is under human review. No chronology is implied.
Loading the story…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Ludhiana Police · Punjab and Haryana High Court · Sumeet Goel
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.