The record
Written from the 1 report below. Nothing here is unsourced.
- The Supreme Court ordered the replacement of the public prosecutor in the trial of Ashish Mishra for the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence.
- Victims raised concerns that the current prosecutor was failing to present key eyewitnesses during court proceedings.
- The court also requested the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court to investigate allegations of misconduct against the presiding trial judge.
- This change aims to ensure a fair trial process for the incident that resulted in eight deaths.
What to watch next
- Appointment of a new senior public prosecutor by the Uttar Pradesh government within two weeks.
- The Allahabad High Court Chief Justice's response to the allegations against the presiding trial judge.
- Submission of the sealed cover report from the Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.
Who said what2
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Surya Kant
Chief Justice of India
1 quote · 1 outlet
“What is unusual is that on a given date when the witnesses are called, why should the public prosecutor give up those witnesses. They are eyewitnesses. This may not be a very fair prosecution if the public prosecutor gives up on witnesses.”
In the article
…government to replace the incumbent prosecutor with a senior public prosecutor having a “fair experience” of conducting trial within two weeks. The bench, also comprising justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, said, “ What is unusual is that on a given date when the witnesses are called, why should the public prosecutor give up those witnesses. They are eyewitnesses. This may not be a very fair prosecution if the public prosecutor gives up on witnesses. ” The order was passed on an application moved by the victims raising concerns over the prosecutor giving up on crucial witnesses and the presiding officer intimidating witnesses by issuing non-bailable warrants against…
Prashant Bhushan
Advocate
1 quote · 1 outlet
“There will be gross miscarriage of justice if this presiding officer continues. Even in this case, where a witness produced an illness slip along with a medical certificate, NBW was issued. The police went to the witness’ house and intimidated the family pursuant to which the witness does not want to appear anymore”
In the article
…has invited scrutiny for withdrawing to himself cases under SC/ST and Prevention of Atrocities Act and Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Acts and granting bail and acquitting persons in many cases. “ There will be gross miscarriage of justice if this presiding officer continues. Even in this case, where a witness produced an illness slip along with a medical certificate, NBW was issued. The police went to the witness’ house and intimidated the family pursuant to which the witness does not want to appear anymore ,” Bhushan said, requesting the presiding officer to be changed. The court directed the application to be forwarded to the Allahabad high court chief justice as it said, “The registry of this court is directed to…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Uttar Pradesh Government · Ajay Mishra · Allahabad High Court · Ashish Mishra · Joymalya Bagchi · Prashant Bhushan · Supreme Court of India · Surya Kant · V Mohana
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.
