The record
Written from the 1 report below. Nothing here is unsourced.
- The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition demanding a CBI investigation into the alleged assault of lawyers at the Bar Council of India premises on August 20-21.
- The court stated that the petitioners should have followed legal procedures by first approaching the Deputy Commissioner of Police or a magistrate.
- The petitioners had requested a CBI probe citing a lack of faith in the Delhi Police due to the Bar Council of India Chairman's affiliation with the ruling party.
- The court ruled that there was no substantial basis to distrust the police force or to bypass standard legal channels for filing complaints.
- This decision upholds established procedural norms for reporting criminal allegations.
What to watch next
- Whether the petitioners file a complaint with the local Deputy Commissioner of Police
- Whether the petitioners move the magistrate's court as suggested by the High Court
Who said what1
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Girish Kathpalia
Judge
1 quote · 1 outlet
“याचिका अपने मौजूदा रूप में सुनवाई योग्य नहीं है”
In the article
…अगस्त की रात दिल्ली स्थित BCI परिसर का है. कोर्ट ने कहा कि वकीलों को पहले संबंधित DCP के पास शिकायत करनी चाहिए थी. वहां से कार्रवाई न होने पर मजिस्ट्रेट की अदालत का रुख किया जा सकता था. जस्टिस गिरिश कठपालिया ने कहा कि याचिका अपने मौजूदा रूप में सुनवाई योग्य नहीं है . अदालत के मुताबिक, शिकायत लेकर पहले पुलिस के वरिष्ठ अधिकारी के पास जाना जरूरी था. अगर वहां से मदद नहीं मिलती, तो कानून में मजिस्ट्रेट के पास जाने का रास्ता भी मौजूद था. वहीं, याचिकाकर्ताओं का कहना था कि BCI चेयरमैन…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Bar Council of India · Central Bureau of Investigation · Delhi Police · Delhi High Court · Girish Kathpalia · Manan Kumar Mishra · Supreme Court
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.