Delhi HC Refuses to Direct Participation of Jiu-Jitsu Player
Headline by Prism · from 1 report
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking to force the government to include a specific athlete in the 2026 Asian Games Jiu-Jitsu competition.
Deccan ChronicleThe brief
Written by software from the 1 report below.
- The Delhi High Court rejected a petition from athlete Shubham Kumar to compete in the 2026 Asian Games in the men's 94 kg Jiu-Jitsu category.
- Officials stated that no Indian contingent was being sent for this category and that the athlete's name was submitted after the deadline.
- The court held that it lacks the authority to interfere in objective decisions made by sports experts.
- This ruling confirms that judicial intervention in national athletic selection processes is limited.
Who said what
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
Amit Mahajan
Judge
2 quotes · 1 outlet
“This court cannot, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, direct the respondents to send an athlete for participation in an event when the respondents have categorically stated that no athlete is being sent for the concerned event and it also stands admitted that the names of the athletes had not be sent by the association before the cut off date i.e. 14.05.2026”
In the article
…participation in a particular category is taken objectively by the authorities and subject experts, which cannot be interfered with. It said no ground was made out to exercise its jurisdiction in the present case. " This court cannot, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, direct the respondents to send an athlete for participation in an event when the respondents have categorically stated that no athlete is being sent for the concerned event and it also stands admitted that the names of the athletes had not be sent by the association before the cut off date i.e. 14.05.2026 ," it said. "The courts also cannot substitute its own decision for that of the competent sporting authorities and compel participation," it added.…
“The courts also cannot substitute its own decision for that of the competent sporting authorities and compel participation”
In the article
…stated that no athlete is being sent for the concerned event and it also stands admitted that the names of the athletes had not be sent by the association before the cut off date i.e. 14.05.2026," it said. " The courts also cannot substitute its own decision for that of the competent sporting authorities and compel participation ," it added.…
Coverage
1 outlet
All filed from India
NamedIndia · Amit Mahajan · Delhi High Court · Shubham Kumar
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Corrections and versions
A correction says what was wrong and why. Every earlier headline and brief of this record is kept.
Something wrong?
Say what, and it arrives with this record's address filled in. A correction is welcome.
Ask this story
Answers cite the 1 report above, or say they can't.