The record
Written by software from the 1 report below. The points restate them; where one says why it matters, that is Prism's reading, not a reported fact.
- The Supreme Court issued directives requiring police and courts to vet POCSO Act complaints arising from matrimonial disputes before ordering arrests.
- Investigators must now engage a child psychiatrist or clinical psychologist to interact with the child victim when evidence is not immediately clear.
- These measures aim to prevent parents from using serious criminal accusations as leverage in custody or divorce battles.
- The ruling does not affect pending trials but establishes a mandatory vetting process for current and future investigations.
What to watch next
- Implementation of psychiatric vetting by police and district authorities
- Impact on the volume of POCSO cases filed during divorce and custody litigation
- Refinement of procedures for Special POCSO courts when assessing private complaints
Who said what2
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
JB Pardiwala
Justice
1 quote · 1 outlet
“We are observing an alarming trend that is on the rise where one parent misuses the legal provisions to gain strategic legal advantage.”
In the article
…it came across a case from Bengaluru where a mother filed a case under the Pocso Act against her husband after she lost a bitter and prolonged custody battle. A bench of justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan said, “ We are observing an alarming trend that is on the rise where one parent misuses the legal provisions to gain strategic legal advantage. ” Besides the incalculable harm caused to the child victim, the court said, “The only objective is to tie up the accused spouse and their family members in knots with the foisted criminal case and ensure that they are…
KV Viswanathan
Justice
1 quote · 1 outlet
“What is alarming is that this tendency of making false accusations is on the rise. Instances are not infrequent where gullible parties are misguided by their advisors, including in some cases by recalcitrant legal professionals, who in their pursuit of the motto of ‘win at any cost’, end up fuelling the fire.”
In the article
…the child experts will not bind the police in arriving at any decision and will not be the sole basis for filing the chargesheet or closure report, as the case may be. Justice Viswanathan, writing for the bench, said, “ What is alarming is that this tendency of making false accusations is on the rise. Instances are not infrequent where gullible parties are misguided by their advisors, including in some cases by recalcitrant legal professionals, who in their pursuit of the motto of ‘win at any cost’, end up fuelling the fire. ” Terming it as a “growing menace”, the court said it has been seen in some cases that such provisions are invoked as a “pressure tactic” or used simply to settle scores or seek revenge. In the case before the court,…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Central Bureau of Investigation · District Child Protection Unit · District Legal Services Authority · JB Pardiwala · KV Viswanathan · National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · Supreme Court of India
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Corrections and versions
A correction says what was wrong and why. Every earlier headline and brief of this record is kept.
Something wrong?
Say what, and it arrives with this record's address filled in. A correction is welcome.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.
