The record
Written from the 1 report below. Nothing here is unsourced.
- Punjab is experiencing a severe groundwater crisis with over 76% of its groundwater blocks classified as over-exploited.
- Large farmers with greater capital can afford deeper wells and more powerful pumps to access receding water levels compared to small farmers.
- Free electricity subsidies currently favor wealthy landholders who dominate water extraction.
- The disparity forces small farmers to purchase water from larger ones and threatens their economic survival.
What to watch next
- Potential government policy changes regarding free agricultural electricity in Punjab.
- Implementation of new government schemes to address groundwater over-exploitation.
- Future adoption of water-saving agricultural practices like drip irrigation among large farmers.
Who said what3
Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.
S.K. Saluja
former Chief Engineer with the Ranjit Sagar
2 quotes · 1 outlet
“Punjab’s blanket, free agricultural electricity is economically crippling the vulnerable smallholders it was meant to protect. Capital-rich large farmers heavily dominate groundwater extraction.”
In the article
…contribute the least to environmental degradation. This makes it clear that the groundwater crisis in Punjab has deepened social and economic inequality in the State,” Prof. Kaur said. Experts voice similar concerns. “ Punjab’s blanket, free agricultural electricity is economically crippling the vulnerable smallholders it was meant to protect. Capital-rich large farmers heavily dominate groundwater extraction. Facing no financial constraints, they have been in the past proactively securing electricity connections for their new and even additional tube-wells, and they have been continuously, fearlessly deepening their…
“Conversely, resource-poor small and marginal farmers lack the capital to deepen their tubewells, and watch helplessly as shallow wells run dry. As a result, they are forced to informally buy water from large farmers in their neighbourhoods. So by maintaining this universal subsidy, the state actively funds a system that enriches wealthy landlords, drains the public exchequer, and accelerates the economic ruin of small farmers”
In the article
…with the Ranjit Sagar and Shahpurkandi dam projects in Punjab, and having decades of experience in the State’s water resource challenges, including groundwater depletion and surface water management, told The Hindu. “ Conversely, resource-poor small and marginal farmers lack the capital to deepen their tubewells, and watch helplessly as shallow wells run dry. As a result, they are forced to informally buy water from large farmers in their neighbourhoods. So by maintaining this universal subsidy, the state actively funds a system that enriches wealthy landlords, drains the public exchequer, and accelerates the economic ruin of small farmers ,” Mr. Saluja said. “The government needs to reconsider the provision of free electricity to farmers in the State. Policy interventions should incentivise and encourage farmers, especially large farmers, to adopt…
Sandeep Kaur
Professor
1 quote · 1 outlet
“It is apparent that large farmers obtain higher returns over cost despite their low groundwater productivity, while the reverse is true in the case of small marginal farmers. The implication of this is that large farmers, who contribute the most to environmental degradation and threaten water sustainability, benefit the most in terms of income accrued, while small and marginal farmers, who bear the cost of environmental degradation and lack of water availability, contribute the least to environmental degradation. This makes it clear that the groundwater crisis in Punjab has deepened social and economic inequality in the State”
In the article
…small farmers have fewer pumping motors per unit area because most of their operational holdings consist of leased-in land. Paddy, tube wells and depleting groundwater: Why Punjab’s water resources are under strain “ It is apparent that large farmers obtain higher returns over cost despite their low groundwater productivity, while the reverse is true in the case of small marginal farmers. The implication of this is that large farmers, who contribute the most to environmental degradation and threaten water sustainability, benefit the most in terms of income accrued, while small and marginal farmers, who bear the cost of environmental degradation and lack of water availability, contribute the least to environmental degradation. This makes it clear that the groundwater crisis in Punjab has deepened social and economic inequality in the State ,” Prof. Kaur said. Experts voice similar concerns. “Punjab’s blanket, free agricultural electricity is economically crippling the vulnerable smallholders it was meant to protect. Capital-rich large farmers heavily…
Coverage1
All filed from India
Named India · Punjab · Central University of Punjab · Sandeep Kaur · S.K. Saluja · The Economic and Political Weekly
The 1 report is listed beside the record.
Ask this story
Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.
