Kerala Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan noted conflicting statements from Pinarayi Vijayan and P.A. Mohamed Riyas regarding a diary seized by the Enforcement Directorate.

Reader brief
Through the Reader lens: What began as an Enforcement Directorate probe into alleged pay-offs by Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited (CMRL) to Exalogic Solutions — a firm linked to Pinarayi Vijayan's family — has grown into an open confrontation in Kerala politics. In a blow to the case, CMRL executives have retracted their earlier statements to the ED about the alleged payments and pay-offs involving Kerala political figures. The ED has nevertheless asked the state government to sanction corruption prosecutions of Pinarayi Vijayan, his daughter Veena Vijayan, and party leader P.A. Mohamed Riyas; the government is seeking legal advice on the request. The CPI(M) has formally condemned the investigation, while opposition leader V.D. Satheesan is highlighting conflicting statements by Vijayan and Riyas over a diary the ED seized, framing them as evidence of concealment. The story now turns on the sanction decision and whether the retracted testimony stalls the probe.
What to watch next
- Whether the Kerala government grants ED sanction to prosecute
- How CMRL's retracted testimony affects the ED case
- Further contradictions over the ED-seized diary
- CPI(M) escalation against the ED; opposition's next move
What was said18
Attributed, verbatim. Every quote is checked against the article it came from. One that does not match is not shown.
P.A. Mohamed Riyas
5 quotes“investigative agency was intimidating individuals into issuing statements against him, Ms. Veena, and Mr. Vijayan.”
In the article
…day he submitted the retraction statement to the ED. At a press conference held on September 11, 2026, following the ED’s report to the State Police Chief, Mr. Riyas, a CPI(M) State secretariat member, alleged that the investigative agency was intimidating individuals into issuing statements against him, Ms. Veena, and Mr. Vijayan. Incidentally, Mr. Suresh Kumar, the current Chief General Manager of CMRL, also submitted a similarly worded retraction statement to the ED and mailed CMRL about the same on May 15, 2024. Published - September 17, 2026…
“investigative agency was intimidating individuals into issuing statements against him, Ms. Veena, and Mr. Vijayan.”
In the article
…day he submitted the retraction statement to the ED. At a press conference held on September 11, 2026, following the ED’s report to the State Police Chief, Mr. Riyas, a CPI(M) State secretariat member, alleged that the investigative agency was intimidating individuals into issuing statements against him, Ms. Veena, and Mr. Vijayan. Incidentally, Mr. Suresh Kumar, the current Chief General Manager of CMRL, also submitted a similarly worded retraction statement to the ED and mailed CMRL about the same on May 15, 2024. Published - September 17, 2026…
“The UDF is seeing a discrepancy in the statement where none exists”
In the article
…reporters in Kozhikode that the UDF government was seeking to provide a political cover to the ED’s excesses against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led Central government’s political rivals, chiefly CPI(M) leaders. “ The UDF is seeing a discrepancy in the statement where none exists ,” he said. On Tuesday, Mr Riyas had claimed that any move to prosecute people based on the questionable payoff entries in the so-called “sludge fund ledger” maintained by CMRL would have “double-edged” legal and…
“When a yellowing leaf falls, green ones mock.”
In the article
…for the UDF government. In what appeared to be an oblique reference to the controversy surrounding the alleged acceptance of “political funds” by UDF leaders from CMRL when in the Opposition, Mr Riyas had quipped: “ When a yellowing leaf falls, green ones mock. ” Meanwhile, Supreme Court lawyer Kaleeswaram Raj told The Hindu that Section 66(2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) required the ED to share information on predicate offences with State law enforcement.…
“the investigative agency was intimidating individuals into issuing statements against him, Ms. Veena, and Mr. Vijayan.”
In the article
…day he submitted the retraction statement to the ED. At a press conference held on September 11, 2026, following the ED’s report to the State Police Chief, CPI(M) Kerala State Secretariat member Mr. Riyas alleged that the investigative agency was intimidating individuals into issuing statements against him, Ms. Veena, and Mr. Vijayan. He further claimed that such statements were then being circulated to the media as official press releases. In its report, the ED had accused Mr. Riyas of “receipt of bribes and transfer of such bribe funds to Dubai…
Ramesh Chennithala
4 quotes“The government expects to receive the legal opinion shortly, after which an appropriate decision will be taken in consultation with the Chief Minister.”
In the article
…of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was initially handed over to the State Police Chief and subsequently forwarded to the Home Secretary. When the Home Secretary sought guidance, the matter was referred for legal counsel. “ The government expects to receive the legal opinion shortly, after which an appropriate decision will be taken in consultation with the Chief Minister. The relevant files and reports have also been submitted to the Advocate General for review,” Mr. Chennithala said. On the controversy surrounding the raid on the Reporter TV office, the Home Minister strongly defended…
“The government expects to receive the legal opinion shortly, after which an appropriate decision will be taken in consultation with the Chief Minister.”
In the article
…of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was initially handed over to the State Police Chief and subsequently forwarded to the Home Secretary. When the Home Secretary sought guidance, the matter was referred for legal counsel. “ The government expects to receive the legal opinion shortly, after which an appropriate decision will be taken in consultation with the Chief Minister. The relevant files and reports have also been submitted to the Advocate General for review,” Mr. Chennithala said. On the controversy surrounding the raid on the Reporter TV office, the Home Minister strongly defended…
“The police have confirmed that no journalist was mistreated or intimidated, broadcasting was not disrupted for even a single second, and the entire search was videographed in the presence of independent witnesses to ensure full legal compliance”
In the article
…team and its former captain Lionel Messi for an international, friendly match in Kochi, and obtained search warrants from the court before conducting searches simultaneously at five locations. No journalist mistreated “ The police have confirmed that no journalist was mistreated or intimidated, broadcasting was not disrupted for even a single second, and the entire search was videographed in the presence of independent witnesses to ensure full legal compliance ,” he said. He added that all police actions remained subject to judicial scrutiny and could be legally challenged in court. The Minister also maintained that the government had no role in deciding the course of the…
“The police have confirmed that no journalist was mistreated or intimidated, broadcasting was not disrupted for even a single second, and the entire search was videographed in the presence of independent witnesses to ensure full legal compliance”
In the article
…team and its former captain Lionel Messi for an international, friendly match in Kochi, and obtained search warrants from the court before conducting searches simultaneously at five locations. No journalist mistreated “ The police have confirmed that no journalist was mistreated or intimidated, broadcasting was not disrupted for even a single second, and the entire search was videographed in the presence of independent witnesses to ensure full legal compliance ,” he said. He added that all police actions remained subject to judicial scrutiny and could be legally challenged in court. The Minister also maintained that the government had no role in deciding the course of the…
P. Suresh Kumar
3 quotes“I felt intimidated and pressurised during the recording of my statements,”
In the article
…on the alleged admission of Mr. Suresh Kumar. Mr. Kumar later submitted a retraction affidavit to the ED Directorate in Delhi, alleging “illegal and high-handed conduct of the officers of the Kochi office of the ED.” “ I felt intimidated and pressurised during the recording of my statements, ” Mr. Kumar, who has since resigned from CMRL, said in a mail to the company dated May 15, 2024, the same day he submitted the retraction statement to the ED. At a press conference held on September 11, 2026, following…
“I felt intimidated and pressurised during the recording of my statements,”
In the article
…on the alleged admission of Mr. Suresh Kumar. Mr. Kumar later submitted a retraction affidavit to the ED Directorate in Delhi, alleging “illegal and high-handed conduct of the officers of the Kochi office of the ED.” “ I felt intimidated and pressurised during the recording of my statements, ” Mr. Kumar, who has since resigned from CMRL, said in a mail to the company dated May 15, 2024, the same day he submitted the retraction statement to the ED. At a press conference held on September 11, 2026, following…
“I had submitted statements/clarifications on various questions raised by them relating to our company during interrogation at the ED office. I felt intimidated and pressurised during the recording of my statements”
In the article
…statement to the ED Directorate in Delhi, alleging “illegal and high-handed conduct of the officers of the Kochi office of the Enforcement Directorate.” The Kochi office had issued him a summons on April 16, 2024. “ I had submitted statements/clarifications on various questions raised by them relating to our company during interrogation at the ED office. I felt intimidated and pressurised during the recording of my statements ,” Mr. Kumar, who has since resigned from CMRL, said in a mail to the company dated May 15, 2024, the same day he submitted the retraction statement to the ED. At a press conference held on September 11, 2026, following…
Rajeev Chandrasekhar
2 quotes“the public suspected a ‘match-fixing’ between the Congress party and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) to hush up the case.”
In the article
…Police recommending the registration of a case against Mr. Vijayan, but no action had yet been taken by the government, he told media persons in Kochi on Friday (September 18, 2026). Mr. Chandrasekhar claimed that the public suspected a ‘match-fixing’ between the Congress party and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) to hush up the case. The United Democratic Front, which came to power highlighting the corruption in the previous Left Democratic Front regime, had to answer why there was a delay in registering a case against Mr. Vijayan, he said. He…
“the public suspected a ‘match-fixing’ between the Congress party and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) to hush up the case.”
In the article
…Police recommending the registration of a case against Mr. Vijayan, but no action had yet been taken by the government, he told media persons in Kochi on Friday (September 18, 2026). Mr. Chandrasekhar claimed that the public suspected a ‘match-fixing’ between the Congress party and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) to hush up the case. The United Democratic Front, which came to power highlighting the corruption in the previous Left Democratic Front regime, had to answer why there was a delay in registering a case against Mr. Vijayan, he said. He…
N. Ajith
2 quotes“I would like to inform you that in this connection, I had submitted a retraction affidavit, on behalf of my brother, to the Director, ED Delhi office on May 15, 2024,”
In the article
…services rendered, citing personal relationships with Mr. Vijayan. In an email to CMRL dated May 15, 2024, Mr. Kartha’s brother N. Ajith alleged that ED officials had forcefully recorded his brother’s statements. “ I would like to inform you that in this connection, I had submitted a retraction affidavit, on behalf of my brother, to the Director, ED Delhi office on May 15, 2024, ” the mail read. On September 7, 2026, the ED sent a detailed report to the State Police Chief seeking registration of a separate FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act and other relevant laws against Mr. Vijayan,…
“I would like to inform you that in this connection, I had submitted a retraction affidavit, on behalf of my brother, to the Director, ED Delhi office on May 15, 2024,”
In the article
…services rendered, citing personal relationships with Mr. Vijayan. In an email to CMRL dated May 15, 2024, Mr. Kartha’s brother N. Ajith alleged that ED officials had forcefully recorded his brother’s statements. “ I would like to inform you that in this connection, I had submitted a retraction affidavit, on behalf of my brother, to the Director, ED Delhi office on May 15, 2024, ” the mail read. On September 7, 2026, the ED sent a detailed report to the State Police Chief seeking registration of a separate FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act and other relevant laws against Mr. Vijayan,…
V.D. Satheesan
1 quote“One asked which diary it was and what diary was being referred to, while the other said it contained details about future business”
In the article
…the notes contained details of financial transactions and claimed they pointed to the transfer of money to Dubai through hawala channels. These are allegations made by the ED and have not been established by a court. " One asked which diary it was and what diary was being referred to, while the other said it contained details about future business ," Satheesan said at a press conference after chairing the weekly Cabinet meeting. Replying to a question on the issue, he said the government was examining the ED's recommendation to register a case against Vijayan and…
Kaleeswaram Raj
1 quote“The law vests such authority solely with the State government and law enforcement”
In the article
…predicate offences with State law enforcement. However, Mr Raj said the rider was that the agency could not insist on the conduct of a prefactory inquiry or registration of a Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) case. “ The law vests such authority solely with the State government and law enforcement ,” he said. Published - September 16, 2026 02:39 pm IST…
So what5
Who is affected first and what likely follows, with a direction and a horizon. Extracted from the reports, never invented.
- Pinarayi Vijayan, Veena Vijayan and P.A. Mohamed Riyas corruption prosecution sought· weeks
- CMRL executives witness statements retracted· immediate
- ED case over Exalogic payments evidence strength weakened· immediate
- Kerala Government sanction decision pending legal advice· days
- CPI(M) leadership political reputational risk· weeks
Sources10
- [1]The HinducriticalKeralam government going soft on ED’s recommendation to register case against Pinarayi, alleges BJP State chief
- [2]The Hindu — KeralacriticalKeralam government going soft on ED’s recommendation to register case against Pinarayi, alleges BJP State chief
- [3]The HinduneutralKeralam government awaits legal advice on ED letter seeking corruption cases against Pinarayi, others: Home Minister
- [4]The Hindu — KeralaneutralKeralam government awaits legal advice on ED letter seeking corruption cases against Pinarayi, others: Home Minister
- [5]The HinduneutralCMRL-Exalogic pay-off case: Sasidharan Kartha too retracted statement to ED
- [6]The Hindu — KeralaneutralCMRL-Exalogic pay-off case: Sasidharan Kartha too retracted statement to ED
- [7]Hindustan TimesneutralKeralam CM Satheesan flags contradictory remarks by Vijayan, Riyas on ED-seized diary
- [8]The Hindu — KeralaneutralCMRL pay-off case: Keralam CM signals that UDF to soon decide on ED demand to prosecute Pinarayi Vijayan