Skip to content
TodayPrism
Updated 2h agoPolitics

Equal work alone not enough to claim equal pay: Supreme Court

Headline by Prism · from 1 report

The Supreme Court of India ruled that functional similarity in work is insufficient to claim equal pay, which must also account for qualifications, experience, and recruitment processes.

1 outlet · 1 report · EnglishOne source so far

The record

Written from the 1 report below. Nothing here is unsourced.

  • The Supreme Court of India has ruled that employees cannot demand equal pay solely based on performing identical duties.
  • The court clarified that pay parity requires establishing equality across multiple factors including recruitment method, educational qualifications, experience, and job responsibilities.
  • This decision concluded a long-standing dispute involving secondary school teachers in Kerala, where the court upheld pay differences due to varying experience levels between teacher groups.

Who said what2

Only words found exactly in the article are shown, attributed and linked to the line they came from.

Dipankar Datta

2 quotes · 1 outlet

  • Equal pay cannot be claimed by merely showing identical work
    [1]Hindustan Times2h agoOpen at the quote ↗
    In the article

    earlier approach under which similarity of work could be enough to seek parity. Today, the doctrine requires courts to examine whether the two groups of employees are equal in all material respects, the bench said. “ Equal pay cannot be claimed by merely showing identical work ,” said the bench, laying down the factors that a claimant-employee must establish for seeking parity. These include parity in the source of recruitment, educational qualifications and experience, appointment through a

  • If there is complete parity qua all such factors and should equal pay be claimed for equal work of equal value, the writ court can intervene and grant appropriate relief; otherwise not
    [1]Hindustan Times2h agoOpen at the quote ↗
    In the article

    full-time status and benefits they had enjoyed before their promotion. The bench said the doctrine can certainly be enforced by constitutional courts, but only after considering the host of factors governing parity. “ If there is complete parity qua all such factors and should equal pay be claimed for equal work of equal value, the writ court can intervene and grant appropriate relief; otherwise not ,” it said. The bench went on to dismiss the appeals filed by the directly recruited teachers, affirming the Kerala High Court’s 2011 judgment that had denied them parity with the promoted and transferred teachers. -

Coverage1

1 report
English national1

All filed from India

Named India · Kerala · Dipankar Datta · Kerala High Court · Sheel Nagu · Supreme Court of India

Ask this story

Answers cite the reports above, or say they can't.

← Today’s record

Equal work alone not enough to claim equal pay: Supreme Court | Prism